Indigenous Americans and Polynesians bridged vast expanses of open ocean around the year 1200 and mingled, leaving incontrovertible proof of their encounter in the DNA of present-day populations, new studies have revealed.
Whether peoples from what is today Colombia or Ecuador drifted thousands of kilometres to tiny islands in the middle of the Pacific, or whether seafaring Polynesians sailed upwind to South America and then back again, is still unknown.
But what is certain, according to a study in Nature, is that it took place hundreds of years before Europeans set foot in either region, and left individuals scattered across what became French Polynesia with signature traces of the New World in their DNA.
“These findings change our understanding of one of the most unknown chapters in the history of our species’ great continental expansions,” the senior author Andreas Moreno-Estrada, principal investigator at Mexico’s National Laboratory of Genomics for biodiversity, told AFP.
Archeologists and historians have tussled for decades over whether Oceania islanders and Indigenous Americans crossed paths during the Middle Ages, and how, if they did, that contact might have unfolded.
In 1947, the Norwegian explorer and writer Thor Heyerdahl went so far as to build a primitive raft – which he called Kon-Tiki, after an Inca god – and sailed from Peru nearly 7,000km for 101 days before crashing into Tuamotus in French Polynesia.
As it turns out, that is one of the islands where snippets of New World DNA showed up.
Heyerdahl was convinced that people from Peru had populated the remote Pacific islands, and wanted to show it was possible. But he only got it half-right, it seems.
“It is more likely that Polynesians reached the Americas, given their voyaging technology and demonstrated ability to cross thousands of miles of open ocean,” the lead author Alexander Ioannidis, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University, told AFP.
Travelling in outrigger canoes, Polynesians established settlements across a vast area inside a triangle formed by the Hawaiian Islands, Easter Island and New Zealand.Up to now, probably the most compelling evidence that pre-American and Polynesian cultures intersected was the sweet potato.“It is native to the Americas, yet it was also on islands thousands of miles away before European contact,” Ioannidis said.
Moreover, Polynesian words for the sweet potato are similar to those in Indigenous American languages in the Andes.
But sceptics pointed out that sweet potato shoots might have made it halfway across the Pacific on their own, on a piece of driftwood, for example.
To look for possible points of convergence, researchers collected genetic data from 15 Indigenous American groups along the Pacific coast of South and Central America, and from 17 Polynesian islands – more than 800 individuals in all.
“We looked for long sequences of DNA with exactly the same code,” said Ioannidis.
The match-up with indigenous groups in Colombia and Ecuador was unmistakable, confirmed both by traditional statistical methods, and new “big data” machine-learning techniques.
The genetic material also revealed the timing of the encounter.
With successive generations, DNA inherited from each parent undergoes “recombination”, whereby pieces of DNA from the mother and father are broken off and fused together.
“By measuring the length of the small Native American pieces of DNA in Polynesians, we can estimate how many generations ago the contact occurred.”
The date that emerged was 1200, around the time Genghis Khan invaded China and the crusades sacked Constantinople.
Among the longstanding articles of belief dismantled by the new findings is the contention that Rapa Nui – better known as Easter Island – was the first place where the two cultures literally came face-to-face.
New computational methods will help scientists and scholars uncover previously inaccessible stories from the past, said Moreno-Estrada.
“Much of history has relied on written accounts, which are generally controlled by, and focus on, those who rule,” he said. “Genetics and data science are now allowing us to tell the perhaps even more incredible – and no less true – stories of the rest of humanity. Millions are flocking to the Guardian for quality news every day. We believe everyone deserves access to factual information, and analysis that has authority and integrity. That’s why, unlike many others, we made a choice: to keep Guardian reporting open for all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay.
As an open, independent news organisation we investigate, interrogate and expose the actions of those in power, without fear. With no shareholders or billionaire owner, our journalism is free from political and commercial bias – this makes us different. We can give a voice to the oppressed and neglected, and stand in solidarity with those who are calling for a fairer future. With your help we can make a difference.
We’re determined to provide journalism that helps each of us better understand the world, and take actions that challenge, unite, and inspire change – in times of crisis and beyond. Our work would not be possible without our readers, who now support our work from 180 countries around the world.
But news organisations are facing an existential threat. With advertising revenues plummeting, the Guardian risks losing a major source of its funding. More than ever before, we’re reliant on financial support from readers to fill the gap. Your support keeps us independent, open, and means we can maintain our high quality reporting – investigating, disentangling and interrogating.
No comments:
Post a Comment